Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 625 2.3 Methodology (Summary) To undertake this analysis we followed a six stage process. The summary process is outlined below and more detail including information on quantities, financial proxies, valuation techniques and Social Return on Investment (SROI) filters has been provided in a separate methodological attachment. Step 1: Identify stakeholders and define material outcomes We have relied on SVA analyses and other published evaluations of existing ranger groups to determine stakeholders that will benefit from the concept and prioritise material outcomes for each. For simplicity only Government, ranger and community outcomes are included. Step 2: Estimate change In order to estimate the quantum of change (e.g. how many people the outcome is relevant to) we have heavily relied on previous evaluations (and the associated stakeholder consultation) and other quantitative data.