Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 629 Figure 3.1: Present value of costs and benefits over 10-year period. 3.2 Estimated benefits In order to identify the benefits, we reviewed benefits identified through previous evaluations and also related literature on Indigenous and other ranger programmes. We considered available data to determine which benefits could be estimated and valued and therefore included in our model. Some identified benefits could not be included because they have not been evaluated sufficiently. An investment will need to be made in the future to collect relevant data to evidence these outcomes. The below table outlines the outcomes that have been included in the model split by the three stakeholder groups considered. We have also categorised the types of outcomes. Whilst acknowledging that the priorities of State and Federal Governments will differ, we have used the five Strategic Priorities identified by PM&C’s Indigenous Advancement Strategy (IAS) as a logical framework by which to categorise outcomes.