Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 6218 4 https://www.dpmc.gov.au/office-best-practice-regulation/publication/cost-benefit-analysis-guidance-note A series of sensitivity analyses were completed to identify the impact of changes to key assumptions. The outcomes for the sensitivity analyses completed for this analysis are included in the table below. Sensitivity 1:  The unique number of rangers (permanent and casual) working as part of the ranger program Many outcomes relate to the number of rangers working hence the analysis is sensitive to changes in this assumption. The holistic case BCR increases by 11% for a 20% increase in the number of rangers. This is small because costs also increase as the number of rangers do (but not by as much as the holistic benefits). Sensitivity 2: Real discount rate This sensitivity has been included as per the guidance provided by the DPM&C Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)4 . Variation in real discount rates has a relatively small impact on BCRs. 3.4 Sensitivity analysis Variable Government outcomes only BCR Holistic case BCR Baseline judgement 212.4 2.33 : 1 3.66 : 1 Low case 169.9 2.18 : 1 3.27 : 1 High case 254.9 2.51 : 1 4.07 : 1 Variable Government outcomes only BCR Holistic case BCR Baseline judgement 7% 2.33 : 1 3.66 : 1 Low case 3% 2.30 : 1 3.61 : 1 High case 10% 2.36 : 1 3.69 : 1